<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Speaking about the subject and social ties means speaking about the subject and discourse. We can do this through either psychoanalytic theory or literary practice. I would like to address the theme indirectly, through literature. Psychoanalysis draws from literature and can in turn have a significant influence on it.<\/p>\n
Man creates himself within an environment and it is through the environment\u2019s discourse that he shapes himself. There is a direct relation between the environment and our unconscious. We cannot decipher the unconscious without interpreting the discourse of the environment or of the Other. It is only through interpretation, which is the basis of the analytic cure, that we can alter our subjective position.<\/p>\n
In literature, the subject is not conventionally the subject of the unconscious, and in order to give life to it within a novel or play, the subject must be embodied in the Other. In other words, it is thanks not to action but to remembering that the subject emerges.<\/p>\n
After undergoing analysis with Jacques Lacan, from 1974 to 1978, I wrote a novel entitled O Papagaio e o Doctor<\/em> (\u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor\u201d), inspired on my work with the French psychoanalyst. Seriema, the book\u2019s heroine, finishes her own analysis without managing to separate from her Doctor. In hopes of achieving this separation, she decides to look back on what happened in their sessions, and in remembering this experience, she ends up exploring the discourse of her ancestors and also delving deep into her own personal history. She discovers the unconscious reason that drove her to seek out the Doctor. In truth, she had only gone to him so as to remain veiled, as her father had wanted. What we have here is, obviously, an Oedipal drama.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor\u201d provides us with material that can shed light on the discourse of the analyst and also of the hysterical female, and it shows us how analytical interpretation, or punctuation, works. Furthermore, it evinces the social context underlying the drama of the heroine, who is both the analysand and the narrator. While she explores her past, she reinvents her future, liberating herself from both her ancestors and the Doctor.<\/p>\n That said, I would like to provide a brief summary of the novel and of the play Adeus Doctor <\/em>(Goodbye, doctor),<\/em> which has been performed in Brazil and France. At the end, we will read and discuss the play.<\/p>\n Were it not for the diaspora that came before me, I would not have written \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor.\u201d When we talk about immigration, we often find ourselves thinking about the compelling events that trigger it, like war, and also about the objective challenges of emigration or immigration.\u00a0 What interests me are the subjective consequences of this process.<\/p>\n For a variety of reasons, the emotional histories of immigrants and their descendants tend to remain hidden. One explanation for this is the intolerance to which immigrants and their descendants are constantly exposed.<\/p>\n In addition to racial, religious, and sex discrimination, there is ethnic discrimination, which applies to groups set apart by their unique social and cultural traits, as reflected in language, religion, or behavior. This type of intolerance finds expression primarily in the form of xenophobia.<\/p>\n Let us remember that the word \u201cxenophobia” comes from the Greek: from \u201cxenos,\u201d meaning \u201cstrange,\u201d and from \u201cphobos,\u201d meaning fear. \u201cXenophobia\u201d thus connotes fear of the stranger, of the foreigner, an aversion to him or her.<\/p>\n I myself experienced this as the descendant of Lebanese immigrants who moved to Brazil in the late nineteenth century to avoid serving in the Turkish army, or, more simply put, to flee war. Lebanon was then part of the Ottoman Empire. People made the crossing in a ship\u2019s hold under precarious conditions, but\u2014contrary to what we find happening today\u2014the vast majority of the immigrants survived.<\/p>\n I wrote \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor\u201d 25 years ago, drawing inspiration from my analysis with Lacan and my ancestors\u2019 crossing. I was fortunate because I had as a reader Mich\u00e8le Sarde, former professor of French literature at the University of Georgetown. Mich\u00e8le wrote the foreword to the French edition. In it, she says: \u201cToday, it makes no sense to ask whether a narrative belongs to this or that literary genre\u2014novel or autobiography. \u2018A book is a product of a self different from the self we express in society, through our habits, in our lives,\u2019 wrote Proust in Contra Sainte-Beuve<\/em>. . . .It is enough to classify \u2018The Parrot and the Doctor\u2019 as post-modern. Novel or autobiography, self-fiction or novel-essay, novella or story, self-portrait or prose poem\u2014Kundera\u2019s Europe, Garc\u00eda M\u00e1rquez\u2019s America, and the universities of the North freed us from this false problem long ago.\u201d<\/p>\n One of the novel\u2019s themes is Brazilian xenophobia towards the Lebanese, Lebanese xenophobia towards Brazilians, and the protagonist\u2019s xenophobia towards herself.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor\u201d is a metaphor of immigration. It takes place in Brazil but could take place anywhere at all. I was only able to write this novel because I had undergone analysis. As a result, I could observe myself and, through the story, reveal the various forms of xenophobia lying at the heart of an identity crisis capable of imploding the world. To begin with, the novel shows us xenophobia against immigrants. The first Lebanese who came to Brazil left their native land behind to escape the Turks. Paradoxically, in the tropics they were called \u201cTurks,\u201d or \u201cpeople eaters.\u201d When they worked as traveling salesmen and showed up on farms to sell their goods, the women would all run off. Above all, the Brazilians wanted to keep their distance.<\/p>\n Yet it must be said that if the native-born is xenophobic towards the immigrant, the immigrant is likewise xenophobic towards the native-born. And so in the novel, the protagonist\u2019s Lebanese grandmother belittles those native to Brazil, while her grandfather takes pride in not being Brazilian; he is always reminding everyone that he descended from the great Phoenician people, who have a 4,000-year history.<\/p>\n The xenophobia of immigrants towards the native-born has serious consequences for their descendants, who end up feeling divided between their ancestors and their compatriots. The only way out of this dilemma is to distance themselves, and this is what happens with Seriema, heroine of \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor,\u201d who travels to France to undergo analysis and discover why she is an impossible being.<\/p>\n In addition to these two forms of xenophobia, there is a third: the immigrant descendant\u2019s xenophobia towards him or herself. And so when our heroine goes to see the psychoanalyst, she omits her ancestors\u2019 story, of those who left Lebanon behind for life in the Americas. In other words, she scotomises the saga of her Lebanese grandparents, who were called \u201cpeople eaters\u201d in Brazil. Like other children of immigrants, Seriema wants the tragic past of immigration to be forgotten.<\/p>\n This leads me to affirm that the descendant of immigrants tends to dissimulate his own history because he doesn\u2019t want to be who he is; he doesn\u2019t want to be the child or grandchild of someone who had to exile himself from his native land and who was humiliated in the country to which he immigrated. In other words, he is a victim of self-xenophobia. Immigration is a narcissistic wound passed down from generation to generation, and a descendant\u2019s history depends on each immigrant\u2019s relationship to his past.<\/p>\n As I painstakingly analyzed my own family\u2019s history, I realized there are two subjective positions. The first is the position of the immigrant who wants to forget the past, while the second is that of the immigrant who tends to glorify it. True to the first position, the protagonist\u2019s grandmother in \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor\u201d has little to say about immigration: \u201cFrom Lebanon to Brazil, at the age of 14, five children\u2014because maktub<\/em>, it is written, and that\u2019s it.\u201d She covers up the past and, perhaps for narcissistic reasons, presents herself as the origin of it all.<\/p>\n When an ancestor behaves this way, the descendant is deprived of his true origins; she suffers, in a manner of speaking, an amputation. The past is like a black hole. To avoid suffering, she must say \u201cno\u201d to her ancestor\u2019s cover-up and remember the past however she can, that is, by re-inventing it.<\/p>\n The second subjective position is that of the immigrant who venerates the past, like our heroine\u2019s grandfather. Because he is a story-teller, he introduces his granddaughter to the East through tales of \u201cthe realms of the lily and papyrus, of the Nile and the pharaohs, sun-bathed obelisks, pyramids, and their guardian, the sphinx.\u201d According to the novel\u2019s heroine, the very roots of her grandfather\u2019s stories made them magic: \u201csmall ancient pearls that he dispensed in our language and in Arabic, that were instilled like a mystery.\u201d Thanks to this grandfather who exalted his past, the heroine likewise values it.<\/p>\n The immigrant who values his past affords his descendant the possibility of addressing it, of comprehending the reason for immigration and overcoming this penchant for xenophobia. As a result, he can have both his ancestor\u2019s country and his own.<\/p>\n Since war is inevitable, so too is immigration, but oblivion can be avoided\u2014memori-cide is a crime as serious as homicide. An immigrant can avoid this by teaching his language to his descendant. Accordingly, this immigrant will not have a descendant who doesn\u2019t speak his language, and the descendant will not be deprived of his own linguistic past. I suffered this deprivation in the flesh. My ancestors not only failed to teach me their language; they also used it to say things I wasn\u2019t supposed to know. That is another reason why I sought out Lacan, the analyst who inspired the Doctor in \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor.\u201d<\/p>\n The novel focuses both on immigration and on the analytical cure, from which the heroine, because of her roots, cannot escape. Since she is from a family of Lebanese immigrants who settled in Brazil, she experiences the drama of a Western descendant of Eastern people.<\/p>\n Seriema\u2019s own particular drama has to do with gender. She doesn\u2019t identify with her biological gender for two reasons. First, she is a modern woman and has ancestors with whom she cannot identify because she sees them as backward. They live only for marriage and motherhood and, furthermore, cannot imagine life without a male child. Second, her biological gender is a problem for our heroine because she is the first-born in an Eastern family\u2014in other words, she holds a position meant for a male. If she is to earn her primogeniture and consider herself a man, she cannot surrender to her female body and become a mother.<\/p>\n The heroine\u2019s drama manifests itself during her analysis when she tells the Doctor she can\u2019t have children because she can\u2019t give them her last name. In other words, motherhood contradicts Seriema\u2019s imaginary gender. Thanks to her work in analysis, however, Seriema gains the ability to choose a father for her child and become a mother.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Parrot and the Doctor\u201d shows us how this plays out. It paints a clear picture of how an analyst proceeds, demonstrating the resources he uses to overcome the analysand\u2019s resistance and bring her to the point where she can acknowledge her roots and her sexual identity.<\/p>\n Years after writing this book, I wrote a play whose theme is likewise psychoanalysis. It centers on the same two characters, the analysand and the Doctor. Performed in Brazil and France, the play is entitled \u201cGoodbye, Doctor.\u201d<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The analyst\u2019s discourse in literature Speaking about the subject and social ties means speaking about the subject and discourse. We can do this through either psychoanalytic theory or literary practice. I would like to address the theme indirectly, through literature. Psychoanalysis draws from literature and can in turn have a significant influence on it. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conferencias"],"yoast_head":"\n